NEW MESSAGE FROM DAVID BODDY

Discussion of the children's schools in the UK.
User avatar
Keir
Posts: 177
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 5:04 am
Location: London

Postby Keir » Tue Jul 05, 2005 2:50 am

Hi Tom,

Thanks for the clarification, and certainly in draft form my post did include a retraction of 'fake' on the basis that if he genuinely belived what he was posting he was not ergo being a fake.

Maybe there was another reason that that word came up. The general seperation between intellect and emotion that I experienced as being encouraged in St J, St V and SES, led to a lot of behaviour that I would now call fake, in that the person is not telling their whole truth, just their intellectual truth. As a whole person (emotionally and intellectually free) they would truly be being themselves.

I recognise that in this instance 'fake' is innapropriate as it is the wrong word entirely. Unfortunately at this time I cannot think what the right word is.

Shout
Posts: 101
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 5:19 pm
Location: Reality
Contact:

Postby Shout » Wed May 03, 2006 6:00 pm

_____________________________________________________________
Last edited by Shout on Wed Nov 22, 2006 7:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Shout
Posts: 101
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 5:19 pm
Location: Reality
Contact:

Witch-doctor

Postby Shout » Sat May 06, 2006 4:34 am

_____________________________________________________________
Child of SES


Return to “St James and St Vedast”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 60 guests