Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2004 7:20 pm
This is the BIG one.
THERE HAS BEEN CHANGE RECENTLY BUT NOT ALL THE WAY
A REALLY GOOD LEADER HANDS BACK POWER STRAIGHT TO THE PEOPLE
Lambie is a bit of a dunce
To see him walk about in a crowded room is to see someone who appears to be half labotomised.
He is socially inept (like we all are) until you get talking to him and I managed to have 2 to 3 or 4 decent conversations with him over the years. Particularly before I just left the S.E.S in 2001.
He revealed himself to be not quite so much of a wombat as I always thought he was.
He has a subtle side as much as he has a labotomised side.
What he shouldn't be doing is overseeing a Borg enterprise.
He should encourage lateral mindedness and free thinking inside the school.
If there were to be an exposition investigation of the school over the coming two years the school wouldn't quite pass the test as it has done on the few occassions it has been investigated in the past.
There are a lot of intelligent people who have left over the past 5 years, who could quite easily band together with the right authorities and explain in technical detail how the school works on a subtle level.
One thing is the people in the school don't appear to notice how they go about things.
It is not fiction what I mentioned in the 'mattstollar spray' as one member kindly termed my long article CLOSE DOWN NO CHANGE YES, regarding how people are manipulated into the school. It is a reality and people who have been involved in that reality as tutors could be used to give a birds eye view.
Rasmussen, Marco Goldscmied, Gordon Ingram are three worldy people who know the ins and outs of things who could give evidence.
NOT TO CLOSE THE SCHOOL DOWN BUT TO CHANGE IT.
The school is not primarilly evil. It's suppossed to be beyond good and evil.
Which is a high charge.
No wonder they haven't figured it out yet.
But the school operates at the highest level on a form of deciet that is difficult to see.
The only way to be completely transparent would be to print the entire transcribed works of LEANARDO DA VINCI MACLAREN, SHEILA ROSENBERG AND SHANTANAND SARASWATI on the net. Then people
could see what they were getting themselves into as they join Part 1.
That would be truly transparent and then the school would really get the members to whom that sort of thing is attractive.
With a proviso also that the school could list a running commentary beneath these works that as it were says which words of these three individuals are treated as gospel and which aren't any more.
Then we could all see what the S.E.S is really about .
At the moment we just don't know.
I never knew when I was in it. I got fragments. But no one in the school in or out knew which of these fragments makes up the whole and which are to be left out.
This is an entirely reasonable suggestion.
At the moment all the information is being stored in the cupboards of a studies in Waterperry and Wood Green.
What is the school really about?
How does it work
Are people encouraged to think for themselves.
Are peoples lives interfered with still (I once got five people randomly suggesting that I should NOT attend contemporary art school all within the space of a few days. A friend of mine had the same)
Young people seem to be particularly vunerable.
Of course care and looking out for people is a completely acceptable phenomenom and people are free to leave also. Free to make their mind up any which way.
BUT THERE IS PRESSURE.
Transparancy as to the school's texts and the NON application of pressure is crucial to the schools survival.
Why care about everyone so much anyway. In some ways it's not that real. I don't think Lambie's given me that much of a second thought since I left. maybe occassionally.
So I'm not anti Lambie essentially, anti S.E.S or anti St James.
There is something there.
But it's being unnessassarily concealed and hidden in turns. They've actually got nothing to hide!
They don't need to become corporate. So new members aren't a priority.
So why not be completely transparent.
That way you don't need to be paranoid, we don't need to be paranoid and the investigating agency's if and when they are called upon don't need to be paranoid.
I'm being staight down the line here. There's no hidden agenda. The agenda is the peice of writing.
I don't want to bring the school down.
I've got a lot of love for it essentially.
And for Lambie