Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2005 11:01 am
Anti-ses. Your response is very revealing. You are happy to make sweeping generalisations (which dont rate a great deal of analysis), and when someone picks you up on your lack of experience in a matter you are so fullsome and disparaging of, you hide behind the smug assertion that I am being rude and confrontational, the implication that you are above being confrontational and you find rudeness distasteful. Funny that. You are happy to be rude and confrontational in your posts and then when someone returns the favour you refuse to answer.
To group yourself with Bella, Katy and Misty is a delusional fatasy. I at no stage suggested that Misty or Katy were indoctrinated, and I singled you out for a reason. Bella, Katy and Misty all tend to ask questions at least, but you tend to tell other people how it is. Whether this is as a result of your education or your culture or any other situation in your life, it is rude and confrontational. If you have never met anyone that told you so before now, you have led a sheltered life.
I am unashamed to admit that I returned a rude and confrontational post as to my mind that is appropriate behaviour in response to your rudeness and confrontation.
The whole point of the majority of the posts on this BB is the subtle, overarching influence of the SES doctrine on St James education policy and practice. Whether you believe that it existed when you were there or not, if you think how long it has taken most posters to recognise it for what it was, it might be another 20 years before you know for sure.
Imo, you are already showing signs of the characteristic arrogance and incapacity to deal with your own and others' emotions that is a feature of the worst effects of following the teaching as espoused at the SES, and by extension at St James. You are of course entitled to disagree.
To group yourself with Bella, Katy and Misty is a delusional fatasy. I at no stage suggested that Misty or Katy were indoctrinated, and I singled you out for a reason. Bella, Katy and Misty all tend to ask questions at least, but you tend to tell other people how it is. Whether this is as a result of your education or your culture or any other situation in your life, it is rude and confrontational. If you have never met anyone that told you so before now, you have led a sheltered life.
I am unashamed to admit that I returned a rude and confrontational post as to my mind that is appropriate behaviour in response to your rudeness and confrontation.
The whole point of the majority of the posts on this BB is the subtle, overarching influence of the SES doctrine on St James education policy and practice. Whether you believe that it existed when you were there or not, if you think how long it has taken most posters to recognise it for what it was, it might be another 20 years before you know for sure.
Imo, you are already showing signs of the characteristic arrogance and incapacity to deal with your own and others' emotions that is a feature of the worst effects of following the teaching as espoused at the SES, and by extension at St James. You are of course entitled to disagree.