Hi Daffy and JAMR,
I wonder if when the site goes off line for some reason the newest ones sometimes go missing?
Bluemoon
Search found 125 matches
- Tue Jun 14, 2011 6:19 am
- Forum: The Australian and NZ schools
- Topic: Just for fun...really?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 87463
- Sun Jun 12, 2011 10:48 am
- Forum: The Australian and NZ schools
- Topic: Just for fun...really?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 87463
Re: Just for fun...really?
Hi JAMR and Daffy,
The last two posts of mine and JAMR seem to have disappeared? What has happened to them - or did I imagine them?!!!
Bluemoon
The last two posts of mine and JAMR seem to have disappeared? What has happened to them - or did I imagine them?!!!
Bluemoon
- Sat Jun 11, 2011 4:28 am
- Forum: The Australian and NZ schools
- Topic: Just for fun...really?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 87463
Re: Just for fun...really?
JAMR wrote: all the above post and: Does this explain my position? Well, lets just say its about as clear as mud! No, really, yes I think it does. You seem to be implying each individual needs to make up their own mind about whether to discuss openly issues concerning a particular organisation (or a...
- Fri Jun 10, 2011 3:45 pm
- Forum: The Australian and NZ schools
- Topic: Just for fun...really?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 87463
Re: Just for fun...really?
Hi JAMR, Interesting points in your post above. I can't disagree with you that our parents, cultures, religions, socio-economic and working arrangements, as well as various other groups and organisations all make us what we are, one way or another. If there is really no real difference between a 'cu...
- Tue Jun 07, 2011 9:10 am
- Forum: The Australian and NZ schools
- Topic: Just for fun...really?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 87463
Re: Just for fun...really?
Hi JAMR, Interesting points, and I agree with you about most of it. After all ‘cult-ure’ and ‘cult’ are very similar (probably derived from the same original meaning??). I do differ with you in that that although our ‘cultures’ may not be transparent, if we could elevate our view beyond our own upbr...
- Sun Jun 05, 2011 2:49 pm
- Forum: The Australian and NZ schools
- Topic: Just for fun...really?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 87463
Re: Just for fun...really?
Thanks for your comments Tootsie and ConcernedMum, Tootsie wrote: I remember somewhere you mentioned they would not let you attend economic lectures after you left the school, which you loved so much. This must have been quite a blow to you. This directive came from DL, I understand. Do you know if ...
- Sun Jun 05, 2011 12:25 pm
- Forum: The Australian and NZ schools
- Topic: Just for fun...really?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 87463
Re: Just for fun...really?
deleted
- Sun Jun 05, 2011 8:35 am
- Forum: The Australian and NZ schools
- Topic: Just for fun...really?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 87463
Re: Just for fun...really?
deleted
- Thu Jun 02, 2011 7:04 pm
- Forum: The Australian and NZ schools
- Topic: Just for fun...really?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 87463
Re: Just for fun...really?
Chittani wrote: In my last years in the School I published a blog for a couple of years questioning a lot of things about it. When it came to light I had a conversation with the leader Mr Lambie about it and after I explained what it was for and he had read it, he was quite encouraging to me. He agr...
- Fri Mar 04, 2011 3:11 am
- Forum: The Australian and NZ schools
- Topic: My letter to Australian GQ (re Hugh Jackman article)
- Replies: 17
- Views: 39356
Re: My letter to Australian GQ (re Hugh Jackman article)
Thanks for your support Woodgreen (post above). Some of the 'material' regarding gender is a paper which is claimed to be conversations between Michael Mavro (whom even Leon M had to dismiss for misconduct eventually) and HH Shantananda Saraswati, but the copy I have of this material (given to me so...
- Wed Mar 02, 2011 7:42 am
- Forum: The Australian and NZ schools
- Topic: My letter to Australian GQ (re Hugh Jackman article)
- Replies: 17
- Views: 39356
- Tue Feb 15, 2011 1:42 pm
- Forum: The Australian and NZ schools
- Topic: My letter to Australian GQ (re Hugh Jackman article)
- Replies: 17
- Views: 39356
Re: My letter to Australian GQ (re Hugh Jackman article)
Re: above post Thanks Woodgreen, thats very kind of you. I've looked at the link and it's helpful. I must admit I find these matters related to the law very confusing. I don't understand how writing about what happened to you and how the organisation works can be claimed to be libel. Thanks again, B...
- Sun Feb 13, 2011 5:28 pm
- Forum: The Australian and NZ schools
- Topic: My letter to Australian GQ (re Hugh Jackman article)
- Replies: 17
- Views: 39356
- Fri Feb 11, 2011 8:20 am
- Forum: Housekeeping
- Topic: "Site crashed" - UPDATED
- Replies: 3
- Views: 9993
Re: "Site crashed" - UPDATED
Hi Daffy, Just want to mention that the last couple of times I've logged in (which is not very often now) the site has responed with 'you have tried too many attempts to enter password' (or something like that) and asked me to put in the verification code as well. Is that normal after a while of not...
- Thu Feb 10, 2011 10:08 pm
- Forum: St James and St Vedast
- Topic: SES CULT + ST. JAMES SCHOOLS MULTI MILLION POUND EMPIRE
- Replies: 9
- Views: 25070
Re: SES CULT + ST. JAMES SCHOOLS MULTI MILLION POUND EMPIRE
Re: GQ article
On the other hand - the fact that the forum is mentioned (and belittled) does nevertheless:
1) publicise its existence
2) indicate that it may be having some effect.
Bluemoon
On the other hand - the fact that the forum is mentioned (and belittled) does nevertheless:
1) publicise its existence
2) indicate that it may be having some effect.
Bluemoon